1. Welcome to VegasMessageBoard
    It appears you are visiting our community as a guest.
    In order to view full-size images, participate in discussions, vote in polls, etc, you will need to Log in or Register.

Resorts World: UPDATE

Discussion in 'Casino Industry & Development' started by UTE, Mar 18, 2016.

  1. Rooster0620

    Rooster0620 Low-Roller

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2015
    Messages:
    155
    Trips to Las Vegas:
    10
    10 years from now we'll all still be talking about the snails pace activity going on at this site.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  2. Jon E Coyote

    Jon E Coyote Low-Roller

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2012
    Messages:
    281
    Location:
    St Louis
    Trips to Las Vegas:
    26

    Can't wait to see the progress next month!
     
  3. hail2skins

    hail2skins Low-Roller

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2011
    Messages:
    383
    Trips to Las Vegas:
    30
  4. h0llywood

    h0llywood High-Roller

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2015
    Messages:
    546
    Location:
    Pasadena, CA
    Trips to Las Vegas:
    40
    Can someone clarify what exactly Resorts World is supposed to be? I am reading everywhere it is supposed to be a Chinese themed resort however I get confused when driving by and it lists other countries like Malaysia, Philippines, etc. I get the impression that it will be a resort highlighting other countries in the "world".
     
  5. hail2skins

    hail2skins Low-Roller

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2011
    Messages:
    383
    Trips to Las Vegas:
    30
    I think what is shown on the fencing in front of the property refers to places where Genting/Resorts World already has existing properties.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  6. h0llywood

    h0llywood High-Roller

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2015
    Messages:
    546
    Location:
    Pasadena, CA
    Trips to Las Vegas:
    40
    Ok that makes sense. I kept seeing London and wondered how that will fit into the Chinese theme.

    Just did a search and Genting Group is a Malaysian conglomerate and have resorts in Malaysia, United Kingdom, Singapore, Hong Kong, Philippines, USA, Korea, China.
     
  7. andrew5499

    andrew5499 Low-Roller

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2012
    Messages:
    119
    Trips to Las Vegas:
    50
    Last edited by a moderator: May 18, 2017
  8. tagac27

    tagac27 Low-Roller

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2009
    Messages:
    135
    Location:
    MA
    Trips to Las Vegas:
    22
    Last edited: May 18, 2017
  9. dmr

    dmr Registered Abuser

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2011
    Messages:
    6,391
    Location:
    Somewhere in Middle America
    Trips to Las Vegas:
    70
    I always wished Boyd hadn't ash-canned the perfectly good casino they had there! :(
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. makikiboy

    makikiboy VIP Whale

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2007
    Messages:
    4,622
    Trips to Las Vegas:
    35
    All the major companies had big plans in those days. I remember Harrah's wanted to build a "supercasino block" that went across flamingo road but they couldn't buy the Bill's casino (now Cromwell) that was on the corner. Harrah's was lucky that they didn't start any work before the market crashed. MGM already started Aria/City Center so they couldn't back out but Boyd started work on Echelon place and tore down the 'dust but were left holding the bag when the market took a dive so they were left without a strip hotel. Had the market crashed a year or more earlier they could have backed out of development and saved the 'dust but they already made the commitment to build Echelon.

    But Boyd came out okay since these guys (Genting) bought them out so now they had a cash infusion that allowed them to take over other casinos (Cannery, etc.).

    So sad, when I go by the area I only see hulks in the block (although it looks like there is some work going on and they already built the big parking structure). Also sad to drive past the Fountainbleu because it looks like they weren't too far from completion when they went bankrupt. Hope somebody picks up the property and completes the place or else it may end up being imploded.
     
    Last edited: May 19, 2017
  11. JWBlue

    JWBlue VIP Whale

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2010
    Messages:
    1,709
    Location:
    Irvine, CA
    Trips to Las Vegas:
    10
  12. vegasdev

    vegasdev VIP Whale

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2016
    Messages:
    1,324
    Trips to Las Vegas:
    55
    the Stardust was such a cherished brand. I could understand if they wanted to implode and build an all new Stardust. but no, somebody had a better plan.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  13. dmr

    dmr Registered Abuser

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2011
    Messages:
    6,391
    Location:
    Somewhere in Middle America
    Trips to Las Vegas:
    70
    I really believe that they thought it to be more lucrative if they totally wipe it and re-brand it and re-theme it, than to either incrementally or all at once re-do it.

    The Stardust was a well known and respected brand, and the property was actually in good shape, but they mostly attracted middle age to older visitors, almost all for gaming, at lower price points than the newer mega-resorts.

    They wanted the younger dollars! Had they simply added an oh-so-trendy velvet rope club and a couple of overpriced absentee-celebrity-chef restaurants, the El Lay party kids would have avoided it and the regulars would have complained. Boyd wanted the younger oh-so-hip crowd with boocoo bux. Their strategy was to close the place, let the regulars migrate to other (hopefully Boyd) properties and forget about the 'Dust, then rebuild using a different model and ring the register.

    They didn't count on having a nasty recession!

    I'm sure they did not see the Great Recession coming until they were past the point of no return on their demolition.
     
  14. leo21

    leo21 VIP Whale

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2010
    Messages:
    5,389
    Location:
    Chicago South Suburbs
    Trips to Las Vegas:
    20
    The Linq is a more practical way of accomplishing what CET, or back then HET, wanted to do. They wanted to physical link the casinos together and it really didn't make sense then, either. Converting that little street does make the casinos north of Flamingo seem more connected. They never really publicly announced a fully developed plan so it doesn't seem like they failed. Plus. the maneuvering with Westward Ho ended up costing Boyd there last grip on the strip. Closing the 'Dust was bad but giving up Barbary Coast was tragic. The only major thing rumored that was really never brought up again was rebranding Bally's. That would have require more investment than they've been willing to put into the place.



    Everyone was so quick to copy City Center before it was even built that folks made a ton of bad decisions. They were even quick to copy the Linq and the Grand Bazaar even now and they aren't solid wins. Had Boyd just stayed the course with the Stardust. they would have been able to try and position it more mid range for a smaller investment or to try and go big now. The more you hear from younger gamblers, they want a lot the same things that older gamblers want in a casino. Boyd would have really benefited from being on the strip today with the way they run their casino. The dining, shows and other retail stuff could have worked itself out.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  15. Grid

    Grid VIP Whale

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2011
    Messages:
    2,011
    Location:
    Chicago
    Trips to Las Vegas:
    31
    I know a lot of people like to wax poetic when it comes to the old Stardust. Yes it would have been better for Boyd had they left it alone, but no one knew the recession was coming. And lets be honest here, Stardust was getting pretty shitty at the end.

    People get sad when one of their favorite old haunts goes bye bye. But much like the Sahara and now Riviera, those places were not well maintained at the end of their run and they all started attracting a lower end clientele. If this didn't get blown up 10 years ago it would have been done so by now. Or at least gutted ala SLS.

    I was reading through some old articles on the Stardust's decline and this was my favorite quote: "“It’s always a little sad to see these places go, but that place was so old and gross — and old and gross don’t belong in Vegas,” said Jeff Remini, 49, of Los Angeles."

    I dont know Jeff, but I gotta agree with him!
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  16. topcard

    topcard Older than the Stardust!

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2012
    Messages:
    3,317
    Location:
    Fort Worth
    Trips to Las Vegas:
    87
    Grid...difference of opinion...it didn't start becoming gross until the closing was announced & they stop throwing money at things like maintenance.
    I have very fond memories of the place...granted, most of them were in the 80s & 90s, but still - in the pre-Mirage days, nobody of that era would have referred to the Stardust as gross or particularly "old".
    Circus? Sure, on both counts.
    Riviera? Not "gross" but thought of as "old" and worn.
    Desert Inn? Neither.
    Westward Ho? A different animal, to be sure, but most folks that played there liked the joint.
     
    It's NEVER "too early" to plan the Spring Trip!!
  17. Drewm1972

    Drewm1972 VIP Whale

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2016
    Messages:
    1,268
    Trips to Las Vegas:
    20
    I can't wait they open up Resort World in 2020 hopefully they open up sooner then that but we shall see... we need more solid competition on strip who can go against MGM &a Cesar's property's. Oh yeah!!! No charge on parking or valet I hope!
     
  18. dmr

    dmr Registered Abuser

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2011
    Messages:
    6,391
    Location:
    Somewhere in Middle America
    Trips to Las Vegas:
    70
    /me holds her breath and turns blue!
     
  19. vegasdev

    vegasdev VIP Whale

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2016
    Messages:
    1,324
    Trips to Las Vegas:
    55
    I would have understood and been fine with it, if they had imploded it to build an all new Stardust. why discard such a valuable, cherished brand?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  20. makikiboy

    makikiboy VIP Whale

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2007
    Messages:
    4,622
    Trips to Las Vegas:
    35
    The problem is that they imploded the Stardust with the intention of building echelon place. The economy was booming and there was lots of construction at the time. City Center already started and Harrahs was looking into building a "supercasino". Who would have known that the economy would tank not soon after. Because of that Boyd put a stop to building, Harrahs killed any thought of building but MGM already started CityCenter so they were committed to building their place. Unfortunate but we don't have a crystal ball that tells us the market will tank.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
Tags: