I set the dice usually to 5:5 on the top with 1:1 facing me. It's doesn't make a blind bit of difference to the roll in my opinion, except this... I notice that when I seven out, it seems to be mostly 6:1. My roll is consistent generally but I do it out of habit and preference rather than a strategy. It's simply how I like to roll. My best rolls have been when I'm trying to hit an exact spot on the back wall. I don't however believe in dice influencing because ultimately dice tumble when it hits the back wall. This thread is focused on whether you have a longer roll depending on how the dice are thrown. I don't believe either gives you a "longer" roll, but you seem to remember the heater rolls more
favorably when the dice are thrown beautifully and consistently. It's the point at which when something different is done and the table "panicks" because something is different. That's what I remember. The late bet going in or hands going into the pit, affecting the time and throw of the dice. We don't generally like any of that when a heater is on, because we don't like to change the variables. I'm sure it doesn't make any difference at all, but we feel as though it does and our memory will recall that. Random rollers or dice setters...the ongoing discussions from this! Well, if the casinos allow you to set dice and request you hit the back wall, then they clearly don't believe there's any advantage in dice setting and they are the ones with enough statistical knowledge to know whether there's an advantage. More to the point, many places I have played don't like dice setting because it slows the game down. If their expectation of a decision is 140 rolls per hour, then slower play will reduce the amount the casino will make based on the house advantage/edge per roll. So they want a faster game. Ultimately that game slows as the table fills up and a hot shoot is in progress. Ultimately I don't care how someone else throws the dice. I can choose whether to bet or not. What matters is the outcome! And in my opinion, it doesn't make any difference with respect to longevity of roll, other than a dice setter will
take a little more time than a random roller. This gives the appearance of a longer roll as someone stated earlier. Furthermore, dice setters generally have more knowledge on the game and tend to play a tighter game, so it appears that it's a more profitable roll for the shooter. Ultimately it's the focus on your bets and how you bet that will determine whether in your mind a roll was successful or not, and that may influence your belief over setting the dice or not (and therefore whether one method is longer or better than the other).
The only time I get bothered when shooting is when a don't player (no issues at all with don't bettors) or someone comes in during the shoot and forces their way in, bets late, gets their hand in the way, and is generally annoying to those on the pass line through disrupting the flow of the game. Either I wait and really slow down the game as I'm shooting, or I'm going for the hand when I throw, and those dice are sharp...