I didn't quite get this weeks article which seem to be his way of looking into ALL the possibilities of what a 'bankroll' is...????
He's basically just being a dick. The sites he is referencing are more or less saying "If you want to play video poker at such and such a level then your bankroll should be this big..." which is meant to be a rough guideline or a ballpark figure to give you an idea. What Bob is saying in his article is his usual "Oh yeah? Well I am smarter than they are..." and then nitpicking a bunch of little things to try and show how their "rule of thumb" type numbers aren't perfect because they didn't take in to account things like how far you have to drive to play VP, does your spouse gamble at the same time as you do, do you get other crap while you play like a buffet pass or a gift card, etc. trying to make it sound like if he made up a bankroll calculator to estimate what level you should play at he would have taken all that in to account because he is perfect in every way.