I thought I had figured out where I was going to stay for my summer trip. Then, this afternoon, a pretty damn sweet offer showed up in my inbox and now I'm not so sure. So, while I ponder whether all the extra freebies from Casino B are enough to get me to switch from Casino A, let me put the question to you, VMB: How much better does the offer from your second or third choice have to be to get you to pick it over your first choice?* Are you completely agnostic and will jump on whatever offer is the best? Are you so enamored of a particular casino (or casinos) that it would take a completely unrealistic offer to get you to consider staying elsewhere? I assume most of us (other than the high rollers who will get everything they want and more from any casino and the very budget minded who must get a great offer in order to justify the trip) fall somewhere in between. Where do you fall on the "Great Property vs. Great Comp" spectrum? What's your "price"? * I'm not talking about some dive 30 minutes from the strip vs. Wynn/Bellagio et al...I mean the "perfect" property vs. the "good" property.