Am I correct in my thinking that at 6/5 blackjack, taking insurance (even money) on your blackjack is the correct play. The 20% gain does not overcome the 33% risk. This as opposed to the 50% reward when playing 3/2 blackjack. Listening to a podcast this morning and they were going-on about insurance never being the correct decision. I don't believe that's the case in this scenario. Correct me if i'm wrong.